Here is my first analogy:
Imagine a man with a bow. He is aiming his bow at a target; the target is the goal, the bow the means which the goal is achieved. If the target is taken away, the bow is of no use to the man, since the purpose of the bow is assist the man in hitting the target. Just as in this example, pragmatism is pointless without idealism, for without ideals to guide one’s pragmatism it is directionless and meaningless. Furthermore, we must value idealism above pragmatism because the final goal is not the bow, but the target; we aim not for total pragmatism, but the completion of an ideal. And if the ideal is forsaken in exchange for the pragmatic, the pragmatic loses its purpose.